Not long ago, smart glasses sounded like something from a futuristic movie, like Tony Stark in Iron Man 3 where he interacted with holographic displays.
Today, these devices are appearing in cafés, airports, offices, and city streets. What looks like an ordinary pair of spectacles may actually be an AI-powered device capable of taking photos, translating languages, answering questions, and understanding its surroundings in real time.
Eyewear has entered into the era of smartness thanks to Big Tech like Apple. Google and Meta integration of artificial intelligence. It has transformed into a sophisticated wearable device, evolving from niche gadgets into mainstream consumer devices.
Powered by on-device or cloud-based AI, smart glasses can evaluate visual and audio inputs to provide tailored insights, facilitate accessibility for users who are blind, or hard of hearing, and enhance productivity in industries like healthcare, and education.
The AI smart glasses market is propelled by the expanding use of wearable technology and the growing need for augmented reality solutions in business and consumer settings. The adoption is accelerating due to a growing reliance on hands-free gadgets for safety and productivity.
The need for AI smart glasses to increase productivity is being driven by the expansion of field services, logistics, and e-commerce. The market is expanding due to growing customer interest in linked wearables for entertainment, fitness, and lifestyle enhancement.
Also Read: Nokia to Bolster Finnish Border Security with Next-Gen Counter-Drone Capabilities
Smart Glasses vs. Privacy
While smart glasses are welcomed in the health and education world, it’s a no-no in every day life. Today’s world is already being invaded by smart phones and covert cookies that give away our personal data to big companies and governments.
It’s the death of privacy in the name of security and marketing. Data is collected from everything. We are tracked at every step.
And smart glasses has made that even worse. Meta’s smart glasses’ new face-recognition feature is not a die for. Face recognition software or technology should only be used by governments for security purposes ONLY!
Face-recognition feature is also on Apple and Samsung smartphones, mainly used for unlocking the device as a security, but there’s no opt-in for smart glasses. Users of smart glasses will know nearly everything about a stranger they pass on the street, on the public transport or restaurants, etc.
This is erosion of privacy at its worse!
Moreover, this information could be used for all the wrong reasons. Bad actors might use it for blackmail a random victim.
Privacy activists believe biometric surveillance is a real menace. There are not enough limitations on what the companies are doing with that data.
Regulation
China may be the first country to tackle this with the first industry code of conduct for smart glasses powered by artificial intelligence. The code calls on smart eyewear manufacturers to adopt a ‘minimum data collection’ approach, provide clear indicators when cameras or microphones are active, and obtain explicit user consent before recording.
It urges companies to make AI algorithms more transparent and explainable, prioritise on-device data processing over cloud computing where possible, and establish mechanisms to detect and patch software vulnerabilities.
The CNIL states that anyone using smart glasses must respect the privacy of individuals whose image or voice may be captured by the glasses and, where necessary, obtain their consent.
Japan’s Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC) has published recommendations regarding notification of purpose of use, security managing measures and related matters when using camera system with a face identification function as well as on points to be noted when displaying customized advertisements based on facial images of individuals captured by cameras installed in electronic bulletin board, etc.
The PPC considers that camera images can fall within the scope of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information, if they can identify a specific individual4. When camera systems extract facial features for identification, they require greater attention than ordinary video surveillance: the purpose of use must be specified so that an identifiable person can predict and assume that advertisements will be distributed based on attribute information extracted from the face image, and the face image must be used within the scope of that purpose of use along with notifying or publicizing the purpose of use.